JUST PART OF THE SCENERY
As I write this I am overseas on a long-needed extended vacation. My wife and I are in a fairly exotic locale as, as I usually do, I’m spending most of the time in the hotel room as naked as possible. Which means most of the time, and completely nude.
Just part of the scenery |
Ouch. A little harsh. I replied that “THAT’S not very good.”
She responded: “I agree. I wasn't going to say it. But the truth is, for many of us women, males prancing or laying about in their birthday suit aren't a turn-on. Well, not our husbands anyway. Hey, but if you get a kick out of it, how can that be bad?”
Again, ouch. But I don’t have this woman as a friend to mince words, and honesty is always the best policy.
(That said, I sincerely hope in most less-screwed-up relationships wives still look upon their naked husbands with some affection.)
After due consideration, I sent her this: “To be honest, I’m not getting naked to entice my wife into anything sexual. As you know, that ain’t happening. But what being naked does is improve our intimacy and bond a teensy amount, which is a good thing. It’s not to be sexual, it’s to be intimate. On her part, she laid around dressed only in a towel today - for some time. Again, not to be erotic but to be intimate with each other.”
This time my friend responded that was a good explanation and I ought to use it in the blog, which brings you, the reader, up to speed.
From my perspective there’s a world of difference between various categories of what we would call explicit behavior. Being naked is not necessarily in and of itself sexual. Appreciating the nude human form has been a fact of much classic art for hundreds if not thousands of years. The human body is something we are hard-wired to appreciate as an evolutionary response as well as a simple desire to procreate.
But what that has allowed us to evolve is the attraction to the nude form that can center on aesthetics and not merely on fuckability.
(I’ve mentioned previously that physical comfort with being nude/with someone else’s nudity is something I think makes someone more sensual all the way around. Not sexuality, but sensuality as its own positive trait.)
That said, I will be the first to acknowledge that my own physique is far removed from that
woman’s form. Obviously I don’t mean male versus female, I mean young and fit versus old and fatter. (I’m working on it.) (The fatter, not much I can do about the older.)
If you can see my penis and not run away screaming I figure it’s not a worst case scenario.
Which brings us full circle to my friend’s comment. And here’s why it was a kick in the gut: There’s a difference between being nude and comfortable, and being nude and being discarded as “part of the scenery.” No one clothed, unclothed, semi-nude - or anything else - wants to be discarded as part of the scenery. Women for generations have fought against that perception of themselves as “eye candy.” And if they are considered to be dismissible as “part of the scenery,” it’s a step backward. The same goes for guys...husbands.
But I’m probably vastly overthinking this. I haven’t masturbated in a week and some, and my testosterone is undoubtedly up. I’ve found that the longer I go without I become more and more focused on nudity - not sex: nudity. Oddly enough.
Which means my wife may get an eyeful these next couple of weeks, and hopefully she doesn’t discard it as just being part of the scenery.
Vacations are always a great time for intimate private exposure. At a beach or pool, I also like to supplement that with some male-bikini exposure, when I can get away with it.
ReplyDeleteFor me, both are certainly sexual to some extent - almost as an alternative to classic sex. And as I've gotten older, it's become something I enjoy more and more, frankly.
Have a great time!
mrrigid
Thanks for the comment Mr R.!
Delete